In which photography gear carrying options were hacked with varying levels of success and failure.
There is a huge volume of products designed for various ways to carry and use photography equipment, but most seem to be designed with the idea that they will be used when photography is the primary activity, and the bag used, will be the primary bag. Of course, as a photographer, it can be argued that photography is ALWAYS my primary activity. But when the other activities occurring require non-photography-centric gear or activities, the methods of carrying photography gear are not always flexible in ways that are needed.
After any adventure I like to reflect on the gear brought along and how well suited it was to the particular activity. Then compile a wish list of what would be desirable for the next such adventure.
![]() |
Sign marker along the Pembrokeshire Coast Path, Pembrokeshire, Wales, U.K. |
Photography gear brought on the trip was a full-frame body with two lenses, a couple filters, and a compact tripod. The challenge was to find a way to carry the photography gear while carrying the full pack, keeping the camera and extra lens accessible for use while walking or cycling, and dry in the variable Welsh weather.
![]() |
Backpack and daypack (REI), small bags for camera+lens (Tamrac) and lens (Think Tank) plus toggle bungee cords |
The solution became two small camera bags with belt loops, one for camera plus lens, (and older Tamrac something, 5510 the tag says) the other for the additional lens (a Think Tank Mirrorless Mover 10-repurposed as a lens case). These were carried on the plane in a packable day pack (stuffs into its own pouch when not in use). The small camera bags fit into the daypack for carry-on bag. When carrying the large pack, the two small camera bags could attach to the pack’s hip belt through the belt loops their backs. This solved the problem of carryon bag, plus having a general purpose day pack for exploring without the full backpack.
So far so good.
All seemed well when testing pre-trip. The reality, not so much. It might have worked out on a larger person, but for me (smallish female), I did not have enough of the webbing available past the padded portion of the belt to get the bags to the sides. Instead, they rode more in front, right over the front hip area, adding weight to the lifting of legs while climbing hills (and on the Pembrokeshire coast path you climb a LOT of hills).
![]() |
It was very very wet with much sopping overgrown vegetation |
While each bag has a top handle which would have allowed the bag to ride in the correct orientation, this was not a good option as the handle slack would cause the bag to more or less dangle and jostle around. With the weather and trail conditions, the aim was to keep the bag as close and as motionless as possible.
Thus, the first item(s) on my camera gear-carry wishlist is a way to solve this problem. Small, padded camera and lens bags with horizontal belt loops on the back would have allowed the bags to stay vertical and the rain covers functioning as intended. Belt loops are not always used for belts.
Ideally it would be nice to see camera-carry gear designed with greater versatility, considering ways in which it might be used in conjunction with other, non-camera-carry gear. Such as a backpack (not the camera kind). Bags are constantly improving. Let's hope that improvements in versatility continue as well.
No comments:
Post a Comment